Formative Assessment: English Teachers’ Perspectives and Practices

Authors

  • Bhim Lal Bhandari Kathmandu University School of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33474/eltar-j.v2i2.7117

Abstract

The study explores English language teachers’ perspectives and practices of formative assessment. In order to achieve the objective, the qualitative research design was used. I adopted the interpretive research paradigm and the qualitative phenomenological research method to bring the lived experiences of the participants. Four teachers from two campuses of Rupandehi were purposively selected as the research participants. The semi-structured interview and open-ended questions were used in order to draw out information from them. The study was carried out within the theoretical framework of constructivism theory. This study reveals English teachers’ good perspectives and practices of formative assessment as they are aware of the value, purposes, and various types of formative assessment. Since their perspective is clear, they use it to improve student's weaknesses, modify their existing practices, and bring desirable changes in time.  However, in practice, teachers do not implement all forms of formative assessment to engage students due to their inadequate practical knowledge, time constraints, and large classrooms.

Author Biography

Bhim Lal Bhandari, Kathmandu University School of Education

M Phil Scholar in English Language education

References

Arrafi, M. A., & Sumarni, B. (2018). Teachers’ understanding of formative assessment. Lingua Cultura, 12(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i1.2113

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Rising standards through classroom assessment. Phil Delta Kappan, 80 (2) 139-149.

Cameron, L. (2010). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, L. Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2013). A guide to teaching practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gronlund, N. E. & Linn R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). alternative approaches and practical guideline. New York: McMillan Publishing Company.

Haq, N. (2014). Formative assessment a systematic part of teaching. NELTA Conference Proceedings, 2014.

Hedge, T. (2014). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140-145.

Hughes, A. (2011). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: CUP.

Kenyon, B. J. (2019). Teachers' formative assessment use to check for understanding and to adjust instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walden University.

Linn, R. L. & Gronland. N. E. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Singapore: Pearson Education.

Richards, J. C. (2010). Curriculum development in language teaching. India: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J. & Platt, H. (1999). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.

Sadler. D. R. (19998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education 5(1), 77-84.

Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. In. Tyler, RW, Gagne, RM, Scriven,

M.(ed.): Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation.eds) : The Methodology of

Evaluation. In. Tyler, Rw, Gagne, Rm, Scriven, M. (Ed.): Perspectives of Curriculum

Evaluation, Rand McNally, Chicago.

Spratt, M. Pulverness, A. & Williams M. (2010). The TKT teaching knowledge test course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, C., & Moon, T. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Ur, P. (2005). A course in language teaching practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-02